Writing code for computers presents its own set of challenges, but crafting code that humans will interact with is an even more complex endeavor. The process begins with a broad and often vague business goal, which must be broken down into clear, logical statements that a computer can execute. However, when the focus shifts to writing code for human users, the task becomes a blend of computer science and psychology. The challenge lies in aligning the code with the mental models of users, making it essential to consider how they will interpret and interact with the code. To facilitate this interaction, it is crucial to prioritize the onboarding experience. Many users may never engage with a tool simply because they find it difficult to get started. Therefore, the onboarding process should not be an afterthought but rather an integral part of the product itself. This means eliminating unnecessary configurations, simplifying API token setups, and ensuring that users can begin using the product within minutes. In a landscape filled with numerous development tools, users have limited patience and energy to explore options, making a smooth onboarding experience vital. Humans learn best through examples rather than abstract concepts. Traditional documentation often begins with core concepts and configurations, which can be overwhelming. Instead, providing a variety of practical examples allows users to grasp how the tool functions in real-world scenarios. This approach not only aids understanding but also helps users find relevant starting points for their specific needs. When users encounter errors, it is essential to guide them back toward success. Developers are more likely to enjoy using a tool if they can quickly resolve issues and achieve their goals. Therefore, every error should be viewed as an opportunity to provide helpful nudges, such as including code snippets in error messages or offering warnings for potential pitfalls. Reducing conceptual overload is another critical aspect of creating user-friendly tools. Each new concept that users must learn adds friction to their experience. While some complexity is necessary, it is important to strike a balance between maintaining functionality and minimizing the number of concepts users need to understand. A tool that simplifies the learning curve while retaining powerful capabilities can significantly enhance user satisfaction. The naming of components within a framework also plays a crucial role in user comprehension. Using familiar terminology can help users latch onto existing mental models, reducing the need for extensive explanations. For instance, calling a component a "function" rather than a more obscure term can facilitate understanding and ease the learning process. Moreover, allowing users to programmatically interact with the framework can unleash their creativity. By enabling direct code manipulation and minimizing configuration requirements, users can explore new use cases and discover innovative solutions. Embracing this exploratory spirit can lead to unexpected insights and improvements. When designing tools, it is important to be cautious with defaults and "magic" features. While these can streamline user experience, they can also lead to confusion if not implemented judiciously. If defaults do not apply in the majority of cases, users may struggle to understand how to customize their experience. The goal should be to enhance readability and clarity, as users will often read code more frequently than they write it. In conclusion, writing code for humans is a multifaceted challenge that requires careful consideration of user experience. From onboarding to error handling, every aspect of the tool should be designed with the user in mind. By focusing on simplicity, familiarity, and programmability, developers can create tools that not only function well but also resonate with users, ultimately leading to a more enjoyable and productive coding experience.